Systems, Not People
- Mar 18
- 3 min read
Updated: Mar 19
Systems, Not People
ISSUE 1 · MARCH 12, 2026
Here’s a pattern you might recognize. The same problems keep showing up project after project — submittals fall behind, buyout drags, coordination meetings turn into firefighting sessions — and every time, you end up solving it the same way: longer hours, harder conversations, more pressure on the same people. The faces change but the problems don’t. That’s not a people problem. That’s a system telling you something.
W. Edwards Deming spent decades making this exact point. In Out of the Crisis (1982), he laid out a framework called the System of Profound Knowledge — and one of its four pillars is “appreciation for a system.” His way of saying: before you judge the people inside a process, understand the process itself.
Deming estimated that 94% of problems in any organization are system problems — built into the way work gets done — and only 6% are attributable to individual performance. That ratio should change how you think about everything on your project.
When a project is bleeding change orders, the instinct is to find someone to blame. The PE who missed the scope gap. The sub who didn’t read the specs. The PM who should have caught it sooner. But the better question is: what about the system made this outcome likely?
Maybe there’s no formal scope review step before buyout. Maybe submittals get logged but nobody tracks whether responses come back in time to avoid delays. Maybe RFIs sit in someone’s inbox for two weeks because there’s no escalation process. These are system problems, not people problems. You can swap out every person on the project without fixing a single one of them.
This is uncomfortable because it shifts responsibility. If your project has a recurring problem — late submittals, missed coordination, scope gaps in buyout — the fix probably isn’t a harder conversation with your team. It’s a harder look at your process. What step is missing? What handoff has no checkpoint? Where does information go to die?
The practical move: the next time something goes wrong, resist the urge to ask “who screwed up?” Ask instead, “what part of our process allowed this to happen?” Write it down. Then fix the process. And apply this lens to your trade partners, too — when you’re vetting subs, ask about their systems. How do they track submittals? How do they manage quality? If the answer is “our guys just know,” that’s not a system. That’s a gamble. The best subcontractors have repeatable processes, not just good people. That’s how you get results that stick — not by finding better people, but by building better systems for the good people you already have.
Something to consider: If the fix is better systems, the first step is usually documenting the ones you already have — and that’s where AI can help right now. Take a process your team runs on every project (buyout, submittal tracking, closeout) and describe it to an AI tool the way you’d explain it to a new PE on their first day. Ask it to turn that into a step-by-step checklist with owners and deadlines. You’ll be surprised how many gaps become obvious once the process is written down. It’s not glamorous work, but it’s exactly the kind of thing that turns tribal knowledge into a system that works even when the people change.
Steel Market Snapshot — Mid-March 2026
HOT-ROLLED COIL $1,015 /ton ▲ 30%+ over 12 months | PLATE +$160 /ton ▲ since mid-Nov ’25 |
BEAMS +$295 /ton ▲ since Mar ’25 · 10–12 wk lead | REBAR +$60 /ton ▲ since Nov ’25 · 4–6 wk lead |
What to watch: Section 232 tariffs remain at 50%. The Supreme Court’s February IEEPA ruling doesn’t touch steel tariffs. Domestic floor stock on beams is thin — mills are booking future rollings. Import beams are competitive even at 50% tariff, with more offshore tonnage expected through 2026. If you’re buying out steel on upcoming projects, lead times and pricing favor earlier commitment over waiting.
Sources
1. Deming, W.E. Out of the Crisis. MIT Press, 1982. 2. Farwest Steel. “Market Overview — Early March 2026.” 3. Steel Industry News. “Nucor Holds at $950/Ton: Q1 2026 Outlook.” 4. Sabre Steel. “U.S. Steel Supply Forecast for 2026.”



